Stop and verify
Halt the transaction and confirm the other party through a different channel.
0x4f905af35cadb0015b04a2fde79987548654363aMeasured
- Age
- 4.2 years
- Transfers
- 745+456 in / 289 out
- Stablecoins
- $27,419 in$27,419 out
- Chains
- 3 active
Further analysis
Address active 1495 days across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum with 745 sampled transfers. Stablecoin inflows and outflows match almost exactly on each chain, and funneling patterns appear on Ethereum and Polygon. No blocklist exposure. Data is summary-level only.
An automated reading of the patterns below, not a finding of fact. The records themselves are listed underneath.
- Red flagEthereum
Funds collected and forwarded to one address
$10,778 arrived from 7 different sources, and 82% of it ($8,867) went on to 0x6a04dd…0738, held for a median of 5 hours. This pass-through shape is what a collection wallet looks like — which may be an exchange deposit address, or a layering step.
- Red flagPolygon
Funds collected and forwarded to one address
$6,947 arrived from 9 different sources, and 96% of it ($6,648) went on to 0xfb4c0e…7df7, held for a median of under an hour. This pass-through shape is what a collection wallet looks like — which may be an exchange deposit address, or a layering step.
- Red flagEthereuminferred
Funneling pattern on Ethereum and Polygon
Ethereum shows 7 sources forwarding $8,866.81 of $10,778.16 inbound (82%) with a 4.71h median delay; Polygon shows 9 sources forwarding $6,648.07 of $6,946.87 (96%) with a 0.18h median delay. Rapid consolidation from multiple sources can indicate layering, but also fits exchange withdrawals, payment processing, or tre…
- Red flaginferred
Near-identical stablecoin in and out totals
Stablecoin inbound and outbound totals match exactly on all three chains (Ethereum $10,778.16, Polygon $6,946.87, Arbitrum $9,694.44). This pass-through behavior is consistent with layering, but equally consistent with a relay, market maker, or bridge-style routing.
- Red flagPolygoninferred
Repeated test-sized inbound transfers
Test-sized inbound counts are 5 on Ethereum, 18 on Polygon, and 17 on Arbitrum, with the smallest amounts as low as $0.000004. Small probe transfers are sometimes used to validate addresses before larger movements, though they are also common in airdrops, dusting, and normal wallet testing.
- Green flag
Active on 3 chains
Transfers found on: Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum One. Sustained use across several chains is uncommon for a single-use address.
- Green flaginferred
No blocklist exposure or contract status
The address is not a contract, has no direct blocklist hit, and no blocklisted neighbours on any of the three chains. This lowers risk relative to the funneling and pass-through signals, though absence of blocklist contact does not rule out unlisted counterparties.
- Green flag
Long-standing transaction history
The address is older than 4 year(s) and has seen regular activity.
Chain by chain3 active of 3 reached
Ethereum
explorer- Transfers
- 288+
- In / out
- 174 / 114
- Stablecoin in / out
- $10,778 / $10,778
- Counterparties
- 52+
- Active for
- 2.8 years
- First seen
- 3 Sept 2022
- Last seen
- 25 Jun 2025
- Assets
- APE, ARB, BICO
- Funds collected and forwarded to one address$10,778 arrived from 7 different sources, and 82% of it ($8,867) went on to 0x6a04dd…0738, held for a median of 5 hours. This pass-through shape is what a collection wallet looks like — which may be an exchange deposit address, or a layering step.
- Funneling pattern on Ethereum and PolygonEthereum shows 7 sources forwarding $8,866.81 of $10,778.16 inbound (82%) with a 4.71h median delay; Polygon shows 9 sources forwarding $6,648.07 of $6,946.87 (96%) with a 0.18h median delay. Rapid consolidation from multiple sources can indicate layering, but also fits exchange withdrawals, payment processing, or tre…
- 5 small incoming transfer(s)Stablecoin transfers of $100 or less arrived here, the smallest being $8.80. This is often a test send before a larger payment — but dusting attacks look the same, so it is context, not a warning.
Measured
- 5 test-sized inbound transfers, smallest $8.8
- $10,778 in from 7 sources, $8,867 forwarded to a single address, typically after 5 hours
Polygon
explorer- Transfers
- 366+
- In / out
- 221 / 145
- Stablecoin in / out
- $6,947 / $6,947
- Counterparties
- 75+
- Active for
- 3.0 years
- First seen
- 9 Oct 2022
- Last seen
- 30 Sept 2025
- Assets
- 5000USDT, AAVE, DAI
- Funds collected and forwarded to one address$6,947 arrived from 9 different sources, and 96% of it ($6,648) went on to 0xfb4c0e…7df7, held for a median of under an hour. This pass-through shape is what a collection wallet looks like — which may be an exchange deposit address, or a layering step.
- Repeated test-sized inbound transfersTest-sized inbound counts are 5 on Ethereum, 18 on Polygon, and 17 on Arbitrum, with the smallest amounts as low as $0.000004. Small probe transfers are sometimes used to validate addresses before larger movements, though they are also common in airdrops, dusting, and normal wallet testing.
- 18 small incoming transfer(s)Stablecoin transfers of $100 or less arrived here, the smallest being under a cent. This is often a test send before a larger payment — but dusting attacks look the same, so it is context, not a warning.
Measured
- 18 test-sized inbound transfers, smallest $0.000004
- $6,947 in from 9 sources, $6,648 forwarded to a single address, typically after under an hour
Arbitrum One
explorer- Transfers
- 91
- In / out
- 61 / 30
- Stablecoin in / out
- $9,694 / $9,694
- Counterparties
- 18
- Active for
- 3.4 years
- First seen
- 12 Jan 2023
- Last seen
- 10 Jun 2026
- Assets
- ACHIVX, DAI, ETH
- 17 small incoming transfer(s)Stablecoin transfers of $100 or less arrived here, the smallest being under a cent. This is often a test send before a larger payment — but dusting attacks look the same, so it is context, not a warning.
Measured
- 17 test-sized inbound transfers, smallest $0.0018
Could not be checked: Base, BNB Chain. Nothing here rules anything in or out on those chains.
- Base was not scanned: the Etherscan API key in use does not cover it. A paid plan would include it.
- BNB Chain was not scanned: the Etherscan API key in use does not cover it. A paid plan would include it.
- The sample limit was reached on Ethereum, Polygon; the real history there is longer than what was scanned.
- Not scanned yet: Tron. An address can be active there without anything showing here.
- Outside this scan: OP Mainnet, Avalanche C-Chain.