Nothing listed, but signals found
This address is on none of the lists we check, and the score reflects that. The findings below describe its activity — read them before you send.
0x085ccc21065c8c718fa0afcb4e842f247c18f1ddMeasured
- Age
- 3 months
- Transfers
- 115114 in / 1 out
- Stablecoins
- $305,560 in$0 out
- Counterparties
- 4
- Chain
- Ethereum
Further analysis
48-day-old Ethereum address, not a contract, no direct blocklist hit. 115 transfers, 114 inbound, only 4 counterparties, ~$305k stablecoin inbound and one outbound. 24 test-sized inbound transfers (smallest $0.0001). Thin data; pattern fits both payment aggregation and possible structuring.
An automated reading of the patterns below, not a finding of fact. The records themselves are listed underneath.
- Red flagEthereuminferred
Extreme inbound skew with almost no outbound
114 of 115 transfers are inbound and stablecoin inbound totals ~$305,560 with zero stablecoin outbound. One-sided accumulation can be normal treasury or exchange deposit behavior, but it also fits layering where funds are received and held rather than moved.
- Red flagEthereuminferred
24 test-sized inbound transfers
24 inbound transfers are test-sized, with the smallest at $0.0001. Small probes are commonly used to verify an address before larger transfers, which is benign in normal onboarding but also a known pre-transfer check in illicit flows.
- Red flagEthereuminferred
Only 4 counterparties for 115 transfers
High transfer count against just 4 unique counterparties suggests repeated transfers with a small set of parties. This is consistent with a business or personal payment relationship, but also with a controlled set of wallets used to move funds.
- Green flagEthereuminferred
No blocklist exposure in sampled data
The address is not directly blocklisted and has no blocklisted neighbours in the sample. This lowers concern, though the sample is small and absence of a hit is not proof of clean funds.
Chain by chain1 active of 3 reached
Ethereum
explorer- Transfers
- 115
- In / out
- 114 / 1
- Stablecoin in / out
- $305,560 / $0
- Counterparties
- 4
- Active for
- 44 days
- First seen
- 20 Aug 2026
- Last seen
- 4 Oct 2026
- Assets
- DAI, ETH
- Extreme inbound skew with almost no outbound114 of 115 transfers are inbound and stablecoin inbound totals ~$305,560 with zero stablecoin outbound. One-sided accumulation can be normal treasury or exchange deposit behavior, but it also fits layering where funds are received and held rather than moved.
- 24 test-sized inbound transfers24 inbound transfers are test-sized, with the smallest at $0.0001. Small probes are commonly used to verify an address before larger transfers, which is benign in normal onboarding but also a known pre-transfer check in illicit flows.
- Only 4 counterparties for 115 transfersHigh transfer count against just 4 unique counterparties suggests repeated transfers with a small set of parties. This is consistent with a business or personal payment relationship, but also with a controlled set of wallets used to move funds.
- 24 small incoming transfer(s)Stablecoin transfers of $100 or less arrived here, the smallest being under a cent. This is often a test send before a larger payment — but dusting attacks look the same, so it is context, not a warning.
- No blocklist exposure in sampled dataThe address is not directly blocklisted and has no blocklisted neighbours in the sample. This lowers concern, though the sample is small and absence of a hit is not proof of clean funds.
Measured
- 24 test-sized inbound transfers, smallest $0.0001
No activity found on: Polygon, Arbitrum One.
Could not be checked: Base, BNB Chain. Nothing here rules anything in or out on those chains.
- Base was not scanned: the Etherscan API key in use does not cover it. A paid plan would include it.
- BNB Chain was not scanned: the Etherscan API key in use does not cover it. A paid plan would include it.
- Not scanned yet: Tron. An address can be active there without anything showing here.
- Outside this scan: OP Mainnet, Avalanche C-Chain.